|
NSF
Grant Proposal -- Submitted October, 2001
Connecting Mathematics, Science and Technology
Project
Overview
Sinclair Community College (Dayton, OH) submits this proposal with
its partner Lakeland Community College (Kirtland, OH). The goal is
to develop
and disseminate low-cost laboratory apparatus and innovative, competency-based,
activity-based, interdisciplinary curriculum materials that integrate
mathematics, science, and technology. The project objectives are to:
- Develop
four curriculum modules incorporating 24 Authentic Learning Tasks
to be distributed to high school and community college faculty
using inquiry-based activities that apply rigorous mathematics
and science to realistic technological tasks.
- Offer four in-depth
Summer Institutes based on the curriculum modules to 72 Ohio high
school and community college faculty.
As a result of this project, the following outcomes will be realized:
Product Outcomes
Four curriculum modules incorporating laboratory apparatus
and innovative, competency-based, activity-based learning through 24
Authentic Learning Tasks (a series of discrete learning events that build
experience and competencies related to the module’s goals) will
be created in the following curriculum modules:
1. Algebra
2. General Mathematics and Trigonometry
3. Science/Physics
4. Technology and Electronics
Immediate
Outcomes
A cadre of 72 Ohio mathematics, science, and technology faculty
with improved knowledge and pedagogic
skills.
Intermediate
Outcomes
A cadre of 72 mathematics, science, and technology faculty,
90% of whom apply their new knowledge
and skills
in their classrooms.
Long-term
Outcomes
Over
the next five years an estimated 16,000 Ohio students will have completed
the curriculum
modules resulting in:
- Improved student
knowledge in mathematics, science, and technology knowledge.
- Improved
student success and retention.
This project will be implemented in two major phases: Curriculum Development
and Summer Institutes.
Phase 1: Curriculum Development will be accomplished using a module curriculum
development process established by the National Center of Excellence
for Advanced Manufacturing Education at Sinclair (funded by National
Science Foundation grant DUE 9454571). The module development process “emphasizes
a hands-on, competency-based process, where skill-building activities
are simultaneously coupled with fundamental theoretical knowledge” (Sinclair
Community College, 1996). The Sinclair PIs have extensive experience
in the process. Leading developers of educational hardware and software
will participate. Curriculum products will be commercially distributed.
Phase 2: Summer Institutes A series of four institutes and follow-up
sessions will be offered for 72 mathematics, science, and technology
faculty from Ohio high schools and two-year colleges. The project team
will disseminate the results to a national audience through articles,
publications, and presentations. Ohio's Systemic Initiative Discovery
has pledged $25,000 in matching funds for the Summer Institutes. (See
attached letter of support.)
Goals
and Objectives
The goal of this Connecting Mathematics, Science and Technology proposal
is to develop and disseminate low-cost laboratory apparatus and innovative,
competency-based, activity-based, interdisciplinary curriculum materials
that integrate mathematics, science, and technology. The project objectives
are to:
1. Develop four curriculum modules incorporating 24 Authentic Learning
Tasks to be distributed to high school and community college faculty
using inquiry-based activities that apply rigorous mathematics and
science to realistic technological tasks.
2. Offer four in-depth Summer Institutes based on the curriculum modules
to 72 Ohio high school and community college faculty.
As a result of this project, the following outcomes will be realized:
Product Outcomes
Four curriculum modules incorporating laboratory apparatus
and innovative, competency-based, activity-based learning through 24
Authentic Learning Tasks (a series of discrete learning events that
build experience and competencies related to the module’s goals)
will be created in the following curriculum modules:
1. Algebra
2. General Mathematics and Trigonometry
3. Science/Physics
4. Technology and Electronics
Immediate Outcomes
A cadre of 72 Ohio mathematics, science, and technology faculty with
improved knowledge and pedagogic skills
Intermediate Outcomes
A cadre of 72 mathematics, science, and technology faculty, 90% of
whom apply their new knowledge and skills in their
classrooms
Long-term Outcomes
Over the next five years an estimated 16,000 Ohio students will have
completed the curriculum modules resulting in:
• Improved student knowledge in mathematics, science, and technology knowledge
• Improved student retention
In 1995 the National Science Foundation provided funding for the National
Center of Excellence for Advanced Manufacturing Education at Sinclair
Community College. Although the National Center of Excellence focuses
on manufacturing education, it has had several major offshoots at Sinclair,
which are not directly related to manufacturing. One major spin-off was
created by Mr. Robert Chaney and Dr. Frederick Thomas who had significant
roles as Cluster Captain for Curriculum Development and Principal Investigator
respectively. They saw the need to transfer the lessons learned into
a competency-based, activity-based, and modularized curriculum approach
and realized the benefits of improving mathematics and physical science
by incorporating hands-on authentic learning experiences. They convinced
Sinclair administrators of the benefits and with college funding created
the Math-Science-Technology Center.
The Math-Science-Technology Center provides technical assistance to faculty
to infuse hands-on, real world, authentic laboratory experiences into
the Sinclair mathematics and science curriculum to strengthen the core
liberal arts courses that are included in associate degrees in engineering
technology. By strengthening these core courses, the associate degree
programs in engineering technology are made stronger.
In addition to having
a national influence, the National Center of Excellence for Advanced Manufacturing
Education has had several major spin-off impacts
at Sinclair Community College.
Figure 1: Impacts of the National Center of Excellence
for Advanced Manufacturing Education Through a series
of classroom activities using calculator-based control systems, the
Math-Science-Technology Center is transforming
mathematics
education at Sinclair in fundamental ways and establishing mathematics
as the focal point for related improvements in science and technology
education. For example, Sinclair's Mathematics Department now incorporates
hands-on laboratory components into all statistics courses and into several
sections of Technical Mathematics I and II (core mathematics courses
required in most engineering technology associate degrees). The pedagogic
shift required basic changes in staffing, room assignments, and—most
of all—in classroom facilitation techniques, but it has shown significant
results. These curriculum changes have resulted in 17.6% improved student
success rates (grades A, B, or C) in statistics courses.
Student success
in statistics courses has improved 17.6% over five years as a result
of incorporating hands-on laboratory components.
Figure 2: Student
Success Rates in Sinclair Statistics Courses
As one mathematics faculty member reports:
" Even many of the best students had trouble at first when I asked them
to apply mathematics in authentic, hands-on tasks, but they really get
into it. Students at all skill levels like seeing how math is used and
they're learning more than before. I could never go back to my old way
of teaching."
The following photograph illustrates the type of math/science laboratory
apparatus created and used by faculty to involve hands-on learning.
Simple, low-cost laboratory apparatus designed and constructed by faculty
are being incorporated in Sinclair mathematics and science courses.

Figure
3: Photo of the Science/Math Laboratory Apparatus Built by Faculty
The following are two examples of how these hands-on experiences are
incorporated into mathematics and physics.
- Mathematics
example: “Too few students think of algebra and trigonometry
as exciting and practical subjects, but a simple control system
project can improve their views dramatically. Using a model airplane
servomotor,
a small flashlight, and other easily available parts with a total
cost of about $20, we can equip students with a calculator-controlled
(or
computer-controlled) light pointer. Like technicians setting up
a new system, students use the algebra of linear functions (plus
considerations
of domain and range) to program the flashlight to shine in any
specified direction. In an extension activity, students modify the
system to function
in automatic mode. For example, I tell students, ‘Set up
a light pointer that will take the input from your range finder
and turn this
flashlight to follow a student walking across the room.’ Students
must do the trigonometry and algebra, create the equations and
enter them as functions in a calculator. One thing I like very
much about the
process is the fact that we faculty can really be a classroom facilitator
or guide on the side, helping students to keep moving forward.
Students right away know if they are correct or not by seeing if
the system works
and they like it when we as faculty help them troubleshoot any
errors that may keep the system from working.” (Sinclair
mathematics faculty)
- Physics
example: “Kinematics, the mathematical description of motion,
often seems abstract and useless to technical students, yet the
concepts are essential as a bridge between mathematics and Newtonian
physics.
Kinematics also has many direct applications in technical fields
such as robotics, material handling, packaging, and manufacturing.
In one
activity, my students measure the distance a small car moves
when it is powered for one second and then predict how far it will
more if powered
for two seconds. They soon discover that accurate predictions
require a more detailed investigation of the car's accelerated motion,
and that
leads to a technological challenge to automate the system. I
say to students: ‘If
a range finder measures the distance from the car to a wall as
x, what equation can you program into your calculator to find t,
the time the
motor should run so the car just reaches the wall.’ In
a more advanced challenge, students actually automate the forward,
back, right, and left
movements of a radio-controlled car.” (Sinclair physics
faculty)
Brief automation tasks such as these provide a practical method by which
faculty can bring technological applications into mathematics and science
classrooms. The tasks are very consistent with the way mathematics and
science are actually used by engineers and technicians. Students are
provided with an existing physical system, then challenged to modify
and improve that system, and test their results. These activities support
the learning of traditional content (for example, the concepts of motion
and forces), but they are more unique in their attention to the links
between academics and technology.
This classroom facilitation process is in close alignment with the National
Science Education Standards (National Research Council, 1996) which calls
for developing "abilities of technological design" that include
problem identification, consideration of alternate solutions, implementation,
evaluation, and communication." Control system activities are also
very closely aligned with the NCTM Principles and Standards for
School Mathematics (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000) which
emphasize the importance of helping students learn to apply mathematical
problem-solving techniques in contexts outside the mathematics classroom.
The ITEA Standards for Technological Literacy (International Technology
Education Association, 2000) are even more explicit in their emphasis
on the importance of teaching the design process and of teaching about
the links between technology and other fields, including mathematics
and science.
Moreover, the AMATYC Crossroads in Mathematics Standards for
Two-Year Colleges provides very strong support for the rigorous use of applied
mathematics as practiced in this project. Speaking of technical programs,
the AMATYC standards say:
“
The mathematical preparation of technical students should focus on applications.
The effectiveness of their education will be very limited, however, if
they do not become proficient in performing basic mathematical skills
and have an intuitive understanding of fundamental mathematical principles.
The mathematics studied by students as part of their technical programs
must support them if their careers change, or if they decide to study
additional more sophisticated mathematics,” (American Mathematical
Association of Two-Year Colleges, 1995).
Sinclair's Math-Science-Technology
Center has expanded its activities beyond Sinclair Community College
to include all aspects
of mathematics
and physical science at the upper secondary and introductory college
levels as they are applied in the fields of engineering, technology,
and other related areas. At the request of the Ohio Board of Regents,
during the summers of 1999 – 2001, Mr. Robert Chaney and Dr. Frederick
Thomas conducted four SAM (science and mathematics) Discovery Institutes
for faculty from junior high schools, high schools, and two-year colleges
in Ohio. The two-week summer institutes, held at Sinclair and Lakeland
Community Colleges, focused on integrating real-world experiments with
calculator-based control systems into mathematics and science courses.
These SAM Discovery Institutes were a success and proved the pedagogic
concept, but did not yield curriculum products that faculty could take
back and use in the classrooms. Although participants enjoyed using their
skills and imagination to create activities, most do not have time to
develop a variety of student learning activities from scratch.
Project Plan
On August 12, 1999 the U.S. Secretary of Education commissioned The
National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st
Century. Chaired by astronaut and former Ohio Senator John Glenn, the
Commission analyzed the state of mathematics and science teaching in
the United States and issued recommendations for improvement. The final
report, entitled, Before It’s Too Late: A Report to the Nation
from the National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for
the 21st Century, paints "a vision of high-quality teaching." The
following key tenets are excerpted from this vision (National Commission
on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century, 2000):
- High-quality
teaching requires that teachers have a deep knowledge of
subject matter. “For this there is no substitute.”
- The process
of inquiry, not merely “giving instruction,” is
the very heart of what teachers do. Inquiry not only tests what students
know, it presses students to put what they know to the test. It uses
hands on approaches to learning, in which students participate in
activities, exercises, and real-life situations to both learn and
apply lesson content.
It teaches students not only what to learn but how to learn.
- High-quality
teaching, especially in the sciences, focuses on the skills of
observation, information gathering, sorting,
classifying,
predicting, and testing. A good science or mathematics teacher encourages
students to try new possibilities, to venture possible explanations,
and to follow them to their logical conclusions.
The report further
recommends creating "Summer Institutes" as
a near-term solution to teacher professional development. It recommends
two-week Summer Institutes to "address the most pressing problems,
such as providing opportunities for upgrading content knowledge for out-of-field
teachers, conducting subject-based workshops for all science and mathematics
teachers, integrating technology into the teaching of mathematics and
science, introducing new teaching methods, and improving skills for teaching
specific subject matter by grade," (National Commission on Mathematics
and Science Teaching for the 21st Century, 2000).
The Project Director and Principal Investigators from Sinclair and Lakeland
have designed this project in alignment with the Glenn Commission report.
Through a series of four summer institutes, 72 high school and community
college faculty will be engaged in professional development activities
that will deepen their knowledge, enhance their understanding on the
role of and practical applications of hands-on, inquiry-driven learning.
These concepts will also be integrated into existing pre-service science
education courses that articulate with the Wright State University College
of Education. The project will be implemented in two major phases: (1)
Curriculum Development and (2) Science and Mathematics (SAM) Summer Institutes.
Phase 1: Curriculum
Development
A central component of the curriculum will be the use of control
systems, an important engineering concept with educational roots
in Seymour Papert's
Logo "turtle" (Pappert, 1980). Like students programming Papert's
turtle to move around on the floor and like modern technicians in the
workplace, the inquiry-based learning activities actively engage students
in using mathematical functions as they plan, test, and refine physical
events.
Inexpensive, easy to build laboratory apparatus for learning activities
on control systems provide a marvelously simple, direct, and effective
way of improving student success. Control system activities engage
learners in using mathematics and science in the classroom in much
the same way
that engineers, medical technicians, and others use embedded computers
to control many operations of automobiles, hospital instruments, home
appliances, and industrial machinery.
The modules and Authentic Learning Tasks developed will use graphing
calculators and the calculator-based laboratory interface. The use
of calculators have important advantages, particularly because of the
low
cost per student and because large numbers of mathematics teachers
are comfortable with the technology. There are also several ways in
which
hand-held calculators emulate the widely used technology of embedded
computers more effectively than do desktop computers.
During this first phase of the project, the Project Director and Principal
Investigators will develop four curriculum modules incorporating the
laboratory apparatus and innovative, competency-based, activity-based
learning. Twenty-four Authentic Learning Tasks (a series of discrete
learning events that build experience and competencies related to the
module’s goals) will be created in the following curriculum modules:
Algebra, General Mathematics and Trigonometry, Science/Physics, and Technology
and Electronics.
The modules will have application for in-service professional development
of existing faculty through Summer Institutes. They will also have
application for the pre-service development of future faculty. Sinclair
faculty will
integrate the modules into existing pre-service science education courses
that articulate with the Wright State University College of Education.
Over the past three years, faculty members from Sinclair and Wright
State have co-developed four inquiry-based science and mathematics
courses
that are offered at both institutions for pre-service teachers. The
modules developed under this NSF project will be integrated into Physics
245—Concepts
in Physics. Marlon Aldridge, Senior Personnel on this project and faculty
member teaching this course will work with colleagues at Wright State
to integrate the modules. Mr. Aldridge will also develop special outreach
programs within Dayton’s inner-city high schools recruiting minority
students into the 2+2 teacher education programs at Sinclair and Wright
State.
Curriculum development will be accomplished by using a module curriculum
development process established through the National Center of Excellence
for Advanced Manufacturing Education at Sinclair (funded by the National
Science Foundation, DUE 9454571). This structured approach for developing
competency-based curriculum is ideal for this project because it will
enable the Principle Investigators, who are subject-matter experts,
to develop curriculum that is educationally sound. This module development
process will be used to create, pilot-test, and publish the competency-based
curriculum modules.
The module development process “emphasizes a hands-on, competency-based
process, where skill-building activities are simultaneously coupled with
fundamental theoretical knowledge” (Sinclair Community College,
1996). According to this nationally tested curriculum development process,
the contextual Authentic Learning Tasks will integrate theory with practice,
providing students experience in applying the new knowledge through experiments
with the laboratory apparatus. Each of the four modules will consist
of:
- A facilitator’s
guide.
- Participant’s
journal.
- Six Authentic
Learning Tasks.
- Video clips
shot in a business/industry that illustrates the basic concepts.
- Student
evaluation methods.
Lyndon McIntyre, Professor of Electronics and Computer Engineering Technology
Department at Sinclair, will be reassigned to design circuit boards and
test systems. Marlon Aldridge, Assistant Professor of Physics at Sinclair,
will integrate the curriculum modules into pre-service science education
courses at Sinclair and Wright State University. Consulting assistance
is included in the budget for external faculty to participate in curriculum
development.
Faculty member proudly gets his science/math laboratory apparatus to
complete the task that was programmed into the graphing calculator.
Figure 4: Photo of the Science/Math Laboratory Apparatus Built by Faculty
The Project Director and PIs will work with a technical writer/editor
to create the curriculum manuscripts. Once the draft materials are completed,
the Project Director will submit them to peer reviewers from AMATYC,
AAPT, and other faculty professional associations. Video clips will be
produced to augment the Authentic Learning Tasks. The video clips will
be shot in a business and industry settings to illustrate the basic concepts.
Materials will be pilot tested by participants of the SAM Summer Institutes.
Final published materials will be created based on the peer review and
pilot testing. The curriculum modules and video clips will be distributed
on CDs.
Also during the Curriculum Development phase, the Project Director and
PIs will negotiate with Norland Research, Vernier Software & Technology,
and other companies to establish dual use agreements with regard to the
development and marketing of new hardware and associated software. Initial
contact with these companies has been very favorable. For this proposal,
the following agreements have been established (see attached letters
of participation):
-
Norland Research will provide robot frames and components at a "substantially
discounted rate" and will provide technical consulting "without
charge."
- Vernier
Software & Technology will offer an $800 mini-grant program
for participants, a discount on its products, free products
for use during the institutes, and ongoing cooperation with the Project
Director
during
curriculum development.
Phase 2: Science and Mathematics (SAM) Summer Institutes
2.1 Recruitment
The intended audiences for the workshops are two-year college tenure
track science and mathematics faculty and high school science and mathematics
teachers from Ohio. The institutes will be publicized to college faculty
through direct mail as well as publications and electronic resources
of the American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges (AMATYC),
American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT), and the American Society
for Engineering Education (ASEE). Another key publication is the Curriculum
and Faculty Development Newsletter for Two-Year College Physics Teachers -- a
newsletter published by Joliet Junior College with NSF funding. In addition,
the summer institutes will be marketed to high school teachers through
the regional and state affiliates of the National Science Teachers Association,
the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, and the International
Technology Education Association. Finally, brochures will be directly
mailed to mathematics and physics departments at two-year colleges and
high schools. To be selected, a faculty member should:
- Have three
years experience teaching science or mathematics.
- Have teaching
assignments primarily in applied mathematics, sciences, and technology.
- Agree to
pilot test the curriculum modules.
- Promise
to use the materials to improve student learning experiences.
Faculty from underserved
populations will be recruited in two ways. First, faculty in Ohio’s 29 Appalachian counties will be targeted
for recruitment. One Summer Institute will be offered in Chillicothe—a
mid-sized city in Appalachian Ohio with appropriate lodging and instructional
facilities. Faculty from urban schools and colleges serving large minority
populations will also be targeted for recruitment as well.
This
project will have a major impact on the way students learn science
and mathematics
in high schools and community colleges throughout Ohio—including
29 Appalachian counties.

Figure 5: Map Showing Workshop Sites
The Project Director will work with the Ohio Appalachian Center for
Higher Education to reach out to colleges and schools within the region.
The Ohio Appalachian Center for Higher Education is a consortium of public
colleges and universities within the twenty-nine county Appalachian region
of Ohio, established by the Ohio General Assembly in1993. The mission
is to increase the level of educational attainment of residents in this
region.
Interested participants will be asked to return their application form
to the Project Director by mid-February of each year. The Project Director
will mail
copies of each application to the selection committee with instructions to
rank, in numerical order, the top applicants for each of the sites and return
them to the Project Director. The selection committee will be comprised of
the Project Director, Sinclair’s Principal Investigators, and the Principal
Investigator at Lakeland Community College. The Project Director will compile
these lists to find the highest-ranking applicants. Selection of participants
will be based on: (1) applicant experience, (2) geographic distribution, (3)
size and type of institutions (Appalachian-serving, urban, rural, suburban),
(4) numbers of faculty from underserved populations (women, minorities), and
(5) interdisciplinary teams from high schools and colleges. The team will strive
to obtain approximately a 50-50 split of college and high school participation.
A geographic and ethnic mix of faculty participants is desired. Alternate participants
will be chosen in the event that any of the selected applicants are unable
to participate. Selected participants and alternates will be notified of their
status by April 1 of each year.
SAM Summer Institutes
The two-week SAM Summer Institutes will be offered according to the
following schedule. Ohio's Systemic Initiative Discovery
has pledged $25,000 in matching
funds to support the Summer Institutes.
SAM
SUMMER INSTITUTE SCHEDULE |
| |
SUMMER 2003 |
SUMMER 2004 |
Sinclair Community
College
(offered in Dayton) Mid-June 2003 |
18
faculty |
--- |
Sinclair Community
College
(offered in Chillicothe in Appalachian Ohio)Mid-June
2004 |
--- |
18
faculty |
Lakeland Community College |
Early-July
2003
18
faculty |
Early-July
2004
18 faculty |
Faculty stipends are included in the budget for two key reasons. First,
high school teachers often seek summer jobs to augment their salaries
and community college faculty often teach during the summer session.
The stipends will encourage participation. The stipend payment schedule
will be structured to assure classroom implementation and follow-up after
the summer institute. Faculty will receive two-thirds of the stipend
at the conclusion of the institute. They will receive the final one-third
after pilot-testing and demonstrating classroom use of the laboratory
apparatus and instructional materials, cooperating with classroom evaluation,
and participating at the Saturday follow-up session.
Second, continuing faculty advancement is often tied to earning graduate
credit after a bachelors and/or master's degree. The participating faculty
may use the stipend to pay for graduate credit for successful completion.
The University of Dayton School of Education has agreed to offer
three graduate-level credits at a preferred rate to faculty that successfully
complete the summer institute. The $60/day stipend included in the budget
is nearly equal to the cost of tuition for three credits at the University
of Dayton.
The daily agenda for the two-week SAM Summer Institutes in shown in the following
table.
WEEK 1 AGENDA
MONDAY
• Introductions, orientation, and administivia
• Sharing activity-based pedagogic philosophy
• Example classroom activities
• Conduct Authentic Learning Task activity
• Building a servo pointer
• Regression on the TI-83 graphing calculator
• Calibrating servo pointer
• Conduct Authentic Learning Task activity
•
Introduce SAM—the Science and Mathematics Robot
TUESDAY
• Introduction
to control circuits
• Electrical safety
• Building a breadboard circuit
• Conduct Authentic Learning Task activity
• Binary numbers
• Using the breadboard circuit to control LEDs, relays, buzzers, motorized
vehicles, lights, etc.
• Conduct Authentic Learning Task activity
• Groups plan original Authentic Learning Tasks for their disciplines
based upon models presented
WEDNESDAY
• Solder
a permanent version of the control circuit on a printed circuit board
• Test and troubleshoot the circuits
• Wiring the circuit to control DC motors, etc.
• Conduct Authentic Learning Task activity
• Other examples using the permanent circuit
• Conduct Authentic Learning Task activity
•
Groups plan original Authentic Learning Tasks for their disciplines based
upon models presented
THURSDAY • Introduction to TI-Graph Link®
• Modify the breadboard circuit to control a stepper motor
• Conduct two Authentic Learning Task activities
• Participant teams draft original Authentic Learning Tasks for their disciplines
based upon models presented
• NSF Proposal writing workshop
FRIDAY • Conduct Authentic Learning Task
activity
• Inter-group presentations and feedback
• Evaluation and wrap-up of Week 1
WEEK 2 AGENDA
MONDAY
• Constructing robot PIC control circuit
• Making connections
• Testing circuit
• Assembling the SAM platform
• Conduct Authentic Learning Task activity
TUESDAY
• Modifying the robot servo motors
• Attaching motors and wheels
• Finishing robot construction and testing
• Conduct Authentic Learning Task activity
•
Calibrate SAM
WEDNESDAY • Programming the robot
• Controlling robot with probes and additional servers
• Conduct two Authentic Learning Task activities
• Participant teams develop original Authentic Learning Tasks using robot
THURSDAY
• Links between school and business
• Conduct Authentic Learning Task activity
•
Participant teams develop original Authentic Learning Tasks using robot
FRIDAY • Inter-group
presentations and feedback
• Plans for pilot testing, Authentic Learning Tasks, follow-up, and for
continuing interaction
• Workshop evaluation and closure
As part of the selection process, the participants will agree to pilot
test the curriculum modules in their classrooms. Using pre-tests, post-tests,
and survey instruments, student learning gains and student impressions
will
be
collected. In addition, faculty will complete a survey instrument evaluating
the modules, Authentic Learning Tasks, and video clips.
Follow-up
Two forms of follow-up will be used after each of the four SAM Summer
Institutes. First the project staff will actively use electronic communications
including
the Sinclair Physics Department web site -- http://www.sinclair.edu/departments/phy/Fred/CBL_Control.html
to establish learning
communities. The site currently has extensive information on science
and math robots and laboratory apparatus. On
this web site a
communications forum will be created so that all participants can
post and receive e-mail.
The web site will also become a repository for any lesson plans,
blueprints and schematic diagrams, and other teacher-designed materials.
In addition,
approximately three months after the SAM Summer Institute, the participants
will reconvene for a two-day follow-up session. Each of the 72 teachers
will share pilot test data, lessons learned, and discuss strengths
and weaknesses
of their new approaches.
The following tables indicate the tasks and implementation timeline
for the project.
[
view implementation timeline tables ]
Experience and Roles
of Senior Personnel
Faculty and staff from two Ohio institutions will partner for the project:
Sinclair Community College and Lakeland Community College.
Sinclair Community College (Dayton, OH)
Sinclair Community College will be the fiscal agent for this project.
Founded in 1887, Sinclair is an open door, comprehensive two-year
college located in
the urban inner city of Dayton, Ohio. Sinclair is Ohio's largest community
college (over 22,200 students) and one of the largest in the United States.
As one of 20 members of the League for Innovation in the Community College,
Sinclair is generally regarded to be in the national forefront of two-year
colleges. Sinclair was recently selected as one of 12 Vanguard Learning Colleges
for "its outstanding record of achievement in learning-centered education." Sinclair's
Math-Science-Technology Center was established to provide technical assistance
to faculty to infuse hands-on, real world, authentic laboratory experiences
into the Sinclair mathematics and science curriculum to strengthen the core
liberal arts courses that are included in many associate degrees in engineering
technology.
Lakeland Community College (Kirtland, OH)
Founded in 1967, Lakeland was the first college in Ohio founded by a vote
of the people. The main campus is located just 25 minutes east of downtown
Cleveland
in Kirtland. The college is accredited by the North Central Association of
Colleges and Secondary Schools and is a member of the Ohio College Association
and the National Commission on Accrediting. Full-time faculty members hold
degrees from more than 50 major universities; a large percentage of faculty
members have earned Ph.D. designations. The student/faculty ratio is 17:1.
There are 76 degree and certificate programs to choose from, with over 1,000
classes offered. Academic divisions include Arts and Humanities, Business,
Engineering Technologies, Science/Health, Social Science and Public Service
Technologies, and Counseling.
The Engineering Technologies Division is one of the most comprehensive in
Ohio. A Bachelor of Science degree is offered on the Lakeland campus through
the
University of Toledo. Twelve associate degrees are offered in the division.
Project Principal
Investigators
Project Director, Robert Chaney, has a Master's degree in Mathematics
from Miami University, and has been a member of the Mathematics Department
at
Sinclair Community College since 1992. He has been very active in working
to incorporate
Authentic Learning Tasks into the teaching of mathematics, particularly
for business and engineering technology students, and has been a
frequent presenter
at meetings around the country. Together with Frederick Thomas, he wrote
the article, "Calculator-Based Control Systems," for Texas Instrument's
Eightysomething, arguing that modern calculators can now provide career-related
learning activities that follow in the tradition of Seymour Pappert. Mr. Chaney
will be the overall administrator for the project involved in developing the
curriculum modules, creating the workshop content, marketing and recruitment,
selecting participants, facilitating the Summer Institutes, and disseminating
the results.
Principal Investigator, Frederick Thomas, has a Ph.D. in Science Education
with a minor in Comparative and International Education from Indiana University,
and has taught for over 25 years at the secondary and college levels in
the U.S. He has significant multicultural experiences having lived in and
taught
in other countries. Since 1984, he has been with the Physics Department
at Sinclair Community College and has been extensively involved with efforts
to coordinate the teaching of mathematics, physics, and technology. Frederick
Thomas will be involved in developing the curriculum modules, creating
the
workshop content, marketing and recruitment, selecting participants, facilitating
at the Summer Institutes, and disseminating the results.
Principal Investigator, Kay Cornelius, is Assistant Professor of Mathematics
at Sinclair Community College. She has been a member of the faculty since
1997. She earned her B.S. in Civil Engineering from Michigan State University
and
M.Ed. in Mathematics from Wright State University. Ms. Cornelius will be
involved in developing the workshop content and as a Summer Institute facilitator.
Lakeland Community College's Principal Investigator, David Durkee is Assistant
Professor of Mechanical Engineering. He earned his Ph.D. at Northwestern
University and B.S.M.E. from Grove City College (PA). In addition he has18
years experience
with AT&T/Lucent Bell Laboratories. Mr. Durkee will manage the logistics
and facilitate the Summer Institutes in Kirtland.
Project Senior Personnel
Senior Personnel, Lynden McIntyre, Professor of Electronics and Computer
Engineering Technology, has been a faculty member at Sinclair since 1989.
He holds an A.S.
in Electronics Engineering Technology from Northwestern Michigan College
and a B.S., M.A. in Electronics Engineering from Central Michigan University.
Mr.
McIntyre will lend his extensive knowledge in circuit design to the project.
Senior Personnel, Marlon Aldridge is Assistant Professor of Physics and
has been a faculty member since 1998. He earned a B.S. in Physics from
Morehouse
College and a M.S. in Physics from Wright State University. Mr. Aldridge
leads Sinclair’s efforts in Project SUSTAIN with Wright State University.
Project SUSTAIN is aligning the required science and mathematics courses
at the two
institutions creating a 2 + 2 program for elementary and secondary teachers.
Mr. Aldridge will integrate the curriculum modules into pre-service science
education courses at Sinclair and Wright State and manage the pilot testing
with pre-service teachers.
Evaluation Plan
This project will be evaluated through a comprehensive outcome assessment
plan. The Project Director will manage the evaluation process submitting
annual reports
to NSF and the project team regarding development areas of the project,
project strengths, and recommendations for improvement.
During the Curriculum Development Phase of the project, the modules
and video clips will be pilot tested in classrooms of 72 participating
faculty.
An
estimated 4,300 students will participate (72 faculty using the products
in three classes
with 20 students per class). Using pre-tests, post-tests, and survey
instruments, student learning gains and student impressions will be
collected. In addition,
the 72 faculty will complete a survey instrument assessing their impressions
of the products. The curriculum materials will also be integrated into
existing pre-service science education courses that articulate with
the Wright State
University College of Education. Using pre-tests, post-tests, and survey
instruments, student learning gains and student impressions will be
collected. The Summer
Institutes will be extensively evaluated. The following project evaluation
matrix provides a detailed description.
PROJECT
EVALUATION MATRIX |
OBJECTIVES |
MEASUREMENT
ACTIVITY |
DATA COLLECTION
APPROACH |
KEY INDIVIDUALS |
SCHEDULE |
| Objective
1: To develop four curriculum modules incorporating 24 Authentic
Learning Tasks to be distributed to high school and community college
faculty using inquiry-based activities that apply rigorous mathematics
and science to realistic technological tasks. |
First draft
of four modules of Authentic Learning Tasks peer reviewed by members
of AMATYC, AAPT, and other faculty professional associations |
Survey forms
to evaluate draft modules (qualitative and quantitative data) |
Project Director
Peer Reviewers |
Module1: October
2002
Module 2: January 2003
Module 3: March 2003
Module 4: May 2003 |
| Pilot testing
with an estimated 2,160 students in 36 Ohio high schools and community
colleges |
Pre-tests, post-tests,
and survey instruments, student learning gains, and student impressions |
Participating faculty who attended 2003 SAM Summer Institutes |
September2003 – April
2004 |
| Pilot testing
with 36 faculty in Ohio high schools and community colleges |
Survey forms
to evaluate draft modules (qualitative and quantitative data) |
Project Director
Participating faculty who attended 2003 SAM Summer Institutes |
September 2003 – April
2004 |
| Pilot testing
with an estimated 2,160 students in 36 Ohio high schools and community
colleges |
Pre-tests, post-tests,
and survey instruments, student learning gains, and student impressions |
Participating
faculty who attended 2004 SAM Summer Institutes |
September 2004 – ongoing |
| Pilot testing
with 36 faculty in Ohio high schools and community colleges |
Survey forms
to evaluate faculty impressions (qualitative and quantitative data) |
Project Director
Participating faculty who attended 2004 SAM Summer Institutes |
September 2004 – ongoing |
| Pilot testing
with an estimated 100 students existing pre-service science education
courses |
Pre-tests, post-tests,
and survey instruments, student learning gains, and student impressions |
Sinclair Senior
Personnel |
September 2003 – ongoing |
| Objective
2: To offer four in-depth Summer Institutes based on the curriculum
modules to 72 Ohio high school and community college faculty. |
SAM Summer Institute
(Dayton and Kirtland) |
Survey forms
to evaluate faculty impressions (qualitative and quantitative data) |
Project Director
Participating faculty |
July 2003 |
| SAM Summer Institute
Follow-up (Dayton and Kirtland) |
Survey forms
to evaluate faculty impressions (qualitative and quantitative data) |
Project Director
Participating faculty |
October 2003 |
| SAM Summer Institute
(Dayton and Chillicothe) |
Survey forms
to evaluate faculty impressions (qualitative and quantitative data) |
Project Director
Participating faculty |
July 2004 |
SAM Summer Institute Follow-up (Dayton and Chillicothe) |
Survey forms
to evaluate faculty impressions (qualitative and quantitative data) |
Project Director
Participating faculty |
October 2004 |
Dissemination Plan
The successes and lessons-learned from the project will be shared nationally
through several methods. First the Project Director will include materials
on Sinclair Physics Department's web site
http://www.sinclair.edu/departments/phy/Fred/CBL_Control.html.
The site
currently has extensive information on science and math robots and past
summer institutes. Second, the project partners will disseminate
the project results and products by making at least 10 presentations
at the local, regional, or national conferences of professional associations.
The nature of the project, the processes used to create the materials,
and segments of the products themselves will be highlighted in the presentations.
Examples of targeted associations include AMATYC, AAPT, ASEE and the
regional and state affiliates of the National Science Teachers Association,
the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, and the International
Technology Education Association.
The CDs of the modules and video clips will be commercially sold. The
following options currently exist. The Sinclair Community College and
Lakeland Community College Bookstores both operate web sites (http://tartanstore.sinclair.edu)
and (http://www.lakeland.cc.oh.us/STUSERVI/BOOKSTOR/BOOKSTOR.HTM) and
can stock and sell the CD products through electronic commerce.
The Project Director and PIs will continue discussions with Norland Research,
Vernier Software & Technology, and other companies to establish marketing
and sales agreements. These companies sell robot frames and components
to construct the science/mathematics laboratory apparatus. The companies
have expressed interest in marketing and selling the CDs through their
sales and distribution networks. During the project, continuing discussions
will determine the most favorable approach.
|
...education
of technicians for the high-technology fields that drive our nation's
economy
|
NSF's
Advanced Technological Education
program promotes improvement in technological education at the undergraduate
and secondary school levels by supporting curriculum
development; the preparation and professional development of college
faculty and secondary school teachers; internships and field experiences
for faculty, teachers, and students; and other activities. With an
emphasis on two-year colleges, the program focuses on the education
of technicians for the high-technology fields that drive our nation's
economy.
|